The Truth About Violence at the RNC and DNC Protests

The Denver police union made this shirt to commemorate the beating of DNC protesters.

The Denver police union made this shirt to commemorate the beating of DNC protesters.

Later this week, I’ll post a closer look at how organizers of protests against the Republican National Convention were arrested as “terrorists.” But first I want to address some of the talk, in the mainstream press and even in activist circles, about violence at mass protests.

The general myth about protest violence goes something like this: A small group of people, wearing black, were bent on causing chaos and police violence was required to protect the public. Ever heard that one before?

Or, this Star Tribune editorial after the RNC sums it up pretty well:

The show of [police] force was a reasonable response to the behavior and the threat posed by a relatively small number of rogue protesters who traveled to the Twin Cities for no other reason than to damage property…

Supporters of the police crackdown on protestors have cited search warrant applications for some of the home raids in Minneapolis—including a bookstore. The warrant includes a string of absurd, unsubstantiated claims, including that an unnamed “reliable source” of the FBI says that 21 heavy packages that a postman says he delivered “contained weapons to be used during the RNC.”

Turns out, attorneys say the boxes were full of vegan literature.
Perhaps they were for those “terrorist” vegan potlucks.

If you only rely on these “official” sources, and don’t both to question them, it could paint a picture of these protesters as “violent.” But check out what John Wise, a national editor for Fox News, had to say:

On September 4, the convention’s last night, Wise and a colleague left the Fox tent to cover a developing protest. He ended up moving back and forth over a series of bridges in downtown St. Paul, usually in response to police orders, shooting stills and video as police-launched weaponry detonated in the background. In the process, he formed a surprisingly good picture of the protesters. (“I’m not just trying to be some liberal journalist,” Wise tells the Phoenix, “but I did not see one protester get violent, break anything, throw anything at anybody, anything like that. People were wanting to get away, but that’s natural — they were scared.”)

Riot cops relax after beating protesters at the RNC.

Riot cops relax after beating protestors at the RNC.

That’s not to say, of course, that in these mass protests there aren’t some situations where protestors initiate violence against police.

But there are two key points that need to be remembered. First, leading up to protests like this, activists are demonized and branded as “extremists” and “domestic terrorists.” Fear is instilled in the general public and law enforcement. Second, local police are being militarized. They’re being outfitted like storm troopers with tear gas cannons, concussion grenades, and other weaponry.

So what happens when you get a bunch of cops hyped up on information about evil protesters and armed to the teeth? Well, check out the image at the top of this post. It’s a t-shirt made by the police union in Denver, celebrating the beatings of protesters at the DNC.

[Check out this video of police conduct at the DNC. And, on a more inspiring note, how the crowd responds when police shut down a lawful Rage Against the Machine concert.]

In some ways, the myth of protest violence is true. It is a small group of people, often from out of state, dressed in all black, that are bent on causing violence and destruction at these mass protests. And they’re called riot cops.

And now, your moment of Zen: Anyone want to try their hand at writing a caption for this photo of Peta pigs and, er, friends?
Cops posing with Peta pigs at the RNC.

Related posts:

  • I think a large number of people will always support the cops no matter what because they hate protesters of any kind, anyone who isn't a mainstream christian gung-ho flag-waving republican. (even mainstream democrats, feeble as I think they are, are starting to become terrorists and antichrists now) I most recently base that opinion on reading comments on the local Minnesota newspaper's website in the weeks after the latest convention, but it was just as true after the 1968 convention which I was reminded of by the pigs photo (the Yippies ran one for president at the time).

    What's ironic is that many of these people are the same ones who get all worked up about their right to bear arms to protect themselves against the government, while at the same time going on about property destruction. You just know they would have been opposed to throwing tea in the harbor.
  • Forager
    It never fails to never reach the question of the system in general and the violence that it perpetuates. It's not surprising but it does reach a point where to me, I'd think that eventually more people would start to understand it all and not just blindly follow the lines that this culture enforces upon us-but then again, I guess that's the point, we've been so indoctrinated to believe the myths it perpetuates that most can't break free of that. It is as Derrick Jensen says, violence can only flow down the hierarchy. Those who resist the terrorists (or police for whatever ways we can distinguish them) and their oppressive actions are not to be accepted.
    Regardless of the thoughts on "violence" and "non-violence" that are out there, self-defense is human nature, and those who sit there and let the police beat the shit out of them and just accept it are flat out insane.
    "So what happens when you get a bunch of cops hyped up on information about evil protesters and armed to the teeth?"
    I have no idea the truth that may exist within this or not as it is an editorial but according to an Infoshop News editorial police were told that anarchists killed several police officers during the 1999 anti-WTO protests in Seattle, those types of lies only served to encourage their violence towards those there.
    I also wanted to add that it's interesting how they always say that the protests were interrupted by just a small minority of people, small group of people wearing black. If it was just a small minority then how the hell can they justify arresting the hundreds of people that were arrested. 800 people (which is what it was if I remember right) is not a small group of people. Nothing shocking, but still interesting that they would continue to propagate the idea that it was a small group when they arrested so many.
  • Stephen
    "21 heavy packages that a postman says he delivered “contained weapons to be used during the RNC.”
    Turns out, attorneys say the boxes were full of vegan literature"

    Knowledge is a weapon against oppression, so they are technically right, but talking from an indefensible position.
  • Thanks Kathy. Did you see that Pogan's dad is on the Joint Terrorism Task Force (or was) and said something incredibly articulate like "I support my son, you gotta do what you gotta do to get an arrest." Love it.

    On the upside, Pogan did make the "Worst People" list on MSNBC.
  • Kathy
    I read the linked article--nice. Impressive performance by the cops. Better safe than sorry, I guess--that crowd could be chock full of vegans and you know how violent they are!! I think most people DO make the assumption that the cops are in the right and the protesters in the wrong, for some reason. You'd think we'd have learned by now that wearing a uniform doesn't necessarily make you the good guy. Let's not forget Patrick Pogan..... wondered what ever happened to him, btw?
  • Also, it just struck me that I should probably say something about my own experiences in situations like this. In the interest of full disclosure, I was beaten while wearing Congressional press credentials at a large antiwar protest.
  • Kathy
    LOL--Love the comment about the riot cops being the ones dressed in black from out of state bent on causing destruction. Very true.........
blog comments powered by Disqus