“Animal Planet Collaborated with Eco-Terrorists”

by Will Potter on November 19, 2008

in Terrorism Scare Mongering

So it hasn’t been verified, but it looks like Al Qaeda released another video today, attacking Barack Obama and warning of future terrorism and bloodshed. You might be asking yourselves such questions as: If Obama “pals around with terrorists,” why don’t these terrorists want to pal around with him? And what ever happened to that guy Osama bin Laden? Oh, and if this terrorist network was chased into caves in Afghanistan after 9/11, how are they still producing and distributing videos around the world SEVEN YEARS LATER?

With this post, though, I wanted to alert you all to another terrorist recruitment video. The evil minds behind this propaganda are airing it on their own network. You might have heard from crazy right wingers that Al Jazeera is terrorist TV. But that’s nothing. There’s a network that is even more powerful, even more freedom hating.

That’s right. Animal Planet.

Animal Planet's In addition to radical programming such as “Puppy Games” and “Meerkat Manor,” Animal Planet is now also airing “Whale Wars.” It’s about the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and their fight against illegal whaling. Sea Shepherd has done things like ram whalers, launch rancid crème pie filling onto whaling ships, and generally raise hell any (nonviolent) way they can.

If that children’s movie Hoot is “soft core eco-terrorism for kids,” well, this is the real freaky deaky stuff.

Or at least that’s what we’re hearing from the Institute of Cetacean Research (read: whalers). Check out this sound bite from Mr. Minoru Morimoto, Director General of ICR:

“It is difficult to understand why a mainstream network would stoop so low as to produce a series that glamorizes and thereby gives support to ecoterrorism. Sea Shepherd’s criminal actions last year in the Antarctic were encouraged directly through the presence of the Animal Planet film team. Animal Planet is responsible for inciting this increased violence and aiding and abetting an international criminal organization.”

Remember, these are the same folks that held activists hostage and shot, yes SHOT, Captain Paul Watson, then called the group “eco-terrorists.” They’ve since responded with a series of points about why there was no shooting (some of which seem plausible, especially given Sea Shepherd and Watson’s penchant for theatrics) and a denial of any hostage taking (my favorite justification that the activists boarded the ship with toothbrushes in their possession… which I guess means that it’s ok to hold them at gun point).

Perhaps the “Institute of Cetacean Research” would well to check out this latest Al Qaeda video. They might get a better idea of what real “terrorism” looks like.

  • http://www.diggingthroughthedirt.blogspot.com Tracy

    It’s called “The Puppy Bowl,” and you can’t get more extreme than that. Puppies knocking each other out of bounds, falling asleep in the water dish, peeing on the field. Sea Shepherd only wishes it were as tough.

  • http://www.greenisthenewred.com Will Potter

    Wait, I think I heard about this. The FBI put out a press release announcing the arrest of a group they called “The Litter,” based on information gleaned from one puppy who turned informant in exchange for a few bones…

  • the duke

    lets not forget the “kitten half-time show”. you will surely be killed by the cuteness of said kittens.

  • Kathy

    I’m confused. As I understand it, the whalers are the ones taking the whales despite laws against doing so. The Sea Shepherd is enforcing the laws that exist, but are not enforced by the governments who should be enforcing them. Doesn’t that make the whalers the criminals???

  • Joe

    I saw the video of Watson discovering he had been shot, it was faked! First the vest that Watson was wearing would only stop handgun rounds, its hard enough to hit someone with a handgun on land and almost impossible to hit someone at 200′ from the pitching deck of a ship to another pitching deck of a ship.

    Second, Watson discovers he was “shot” some time after his attack on the whaleing vessel,that was a joke. Anyone who has ever been shot wearing a vest will tell you this…IT HURTS! Vest will stop the bullet but you know have been hit and it leaves a bruse where you were hit.

    Wake up people Watson getting shot was jus a staged stunt in order to make him and his terrorist crew look like victims.

  • http://www.greenisthenewred.com Will Potter

    Joe: I see what you’re saying with the second point. That seemed odd to me as well. I’ve never been shot, with or without a vest, but I have to think it would hurt like hell regardless. That being said, the video clip doesn’t show Watson right when he’s shot (or alleges he’s shot), it shows him discovering the round.

    As to the first point: the difficulty of shooting someone from another ship mean it didn’t happen.

    The bigger point here, with this post, is how in the world do you justify labeling Animal Planet as “eco-terrorists” for DOCUMENTING what is going on? That’s guilt by association at its most absurd.

  • http://www.greenisthenewred.com Will Potter

    Kathy: I think that’s a great point. And it exposes yet another problem with the “terrorist” label being applied so recklessly… in this case to those who intend to enforce the law.

  • Stephen

    Wake up Joe. The whalers are criminals, are we just supposed to let them get away with it. As usual, you spectacularly miss the point.

  • Joe

    Will, I am not trying to label Animal Planet as eco-terrorist (Watson and his crew, yes). Staging dramatic stunts like Watson getting shot is not documenting anything, its creating fiction. Another question I have how come Watson was the only one wearing a vest and the only one who was hit?

    Good luck with your masters, I know how hard it is to work full time and school too. I trying to finish mine now as well.

  • Kathy

    This just goes to show that the person on the side of the animals is always viewed as being in the wrong, even if he/she is actually enforcing the law. Same thing with the ALF or PETA getting video of animals being treated inconsistently with the Animal Welfare Act. They are treated as the criminals when, in fact, it is the scientists who are breaking the law. I really think that animal protection laws are passed to appease the public, but with no intent of enforcement. This is wrong. If the government will not enforce these laws, then I commend those who are willing to step up and do it.

  • kevin

    so lets say he wasnt shot and did fake the whole thing. the almost sad part is that he would have to fake being shot in the first place to get national attention, i think that says enough about the general public. that its not enough to see innocent whales being harpooned for “scientific research” but humans have to be affected somehow by it all to stop these attrcoities. its almost on par to the reasons why many whites began to support integration of schools: they felt their children would grow up in a diverse environment with children of all colors. nevermind the idea that integration may simply be fair and just for blacks alone and that is reason enough to support it. but in any social justice movement outsiders who dont necessarily support it have and still are always trying to find a way to benefit from it. maybe thats why the animal rights movement hasnt been as strong as it could be. we havent found ways to profit off the liberation of animals.

  • cubestar

    Tip to Joe – Every time an organization or individual misuses the word “terror*”, they de-legitimize themselves and the word itself. It kinda hurts your attempted false transparency.

  • http://afbloghi.blogspot.com Julie Afsahi

    This article really brings back memories of my high school (maybe middle school?) insomnia, staying up till 4am and watching videos of some old guy with a big rusty ship hitting whaling ships. It was a forgotten memory until reading your article. Thanks!

  • http://www.dogmad.com/ Dog Stuff

    Future generations will be able to judge very clearly that the criminals of the piece are the whalers; not the good people on the Sea Shepherd.
    Given the French government sanctioned the killing of innocent people involved in peaceful protest it’s clear that governments can be terrorists as well.

  • http://sleepingjellyfish.wordpress.com Jonathan

    I worked at the Mountain Film Festival one summer and there was a special documentary being shown on Watson and the Sea Shepherd and his past with Greenpeace. It was a really great film and we were able to ask questions to a couple of people who had previously been on the crew on voyages. I remember one thing in particular that he said about violence. That you couldn’t be violent to non-living things. I know there could be a hot debate over that statement, but I think its consistent with how exaggerated and over-used the T word is. When property, equipment, and profits are destroyed it is called terrorism, but when both human and non-human lives are taken it apparently is not always so.

    Last time I skyped my mom from Japan she said she had seen the show and asked me about it. That it seemed like something I would be interested in. Shes a good mom. and she liked the show too.

  • matthew

    Freals, though, this show is totally awesome (even if that’s not really the topic of this post).

    Oh, and I think the ‘got shot’ vs ‘didn’t get shot’ is likely explained by shrapnel from those flash gernades the japanese throw at the Sea Sheppard. I heard that possibility discussed somewhere else and it would seem to explain everything pretty nearly.

  • Joe

    Matthew ….In the video Watson pulls a rounded slug from the vest and shows it to the camera.

  • David

    I have watch a couple of these shows and I’m calling BS on the whole “hostage” thing. Look, regardless of what the letter was, the two people that boarded the whaling vessel illegally boarded the ship. The Japanese crew had every right to throw them off (which they resisted) therefore, they had every right to detain them. They were not kidnapped or held hostage.
    Imagine if someone was to enter your home because they had a letter saying that you shouldn’t have a real tree for Christmas, you have the right to use force to remove them from your home REGARDLESS of what the hell their letter says (unless it’s a warrent). If they don’t want to leave, you have the right to detain them for the authority. In the case of a ship at sea, the authority is not going to be readily available, so yes, you would have to detain them.

  • http://www.greenisthenewred.com Will Potter

    David,
    How is illegally killing whales analogous to having a Christmas tree?

    Regardless: If you think someone is justified in taking illegal action in order to stop or minimize the damage of someone else breaking the law (as in the Christmas tree breaking and entering) then logically, wouldn’t it follow that Sea Shepherd is justified in taking action to stop the illegal slaughter of whales?

  • Q


    David,
    How is illegally killing whales analogous to having a Christmas tree?

    Regardless: If you think someone is justified in taking illegal action in order to stop or minimize the damage of someone else breaking the law (as in the Christmas tree breaking and entering) then logically, wouldn’t it follow that Sea Shepherd is justified in taking action to stop the illegal slaughter of whales?

    1) On the episode of “Whale Wars” where they discover a spy ship trailing them, members of Sea Shepherd ADMITTED that international law supports the Japanese on their whale hunts.
    2) It is LEGAL to detain/use force against home invaders. The level of force varies from state to state, but in general you have the right to defend yourself.

    Now try and find some legal body that will justify forced boarding of another vessel on the high seas.

  • Mike

    Okay, I have a somewhat unique perspective of this incident in that I was an Army Cavalry Scout for three years with an expert’s badge in rifle and pistol marksmanship and a CSI for several years after my tour of duty in the military.

    Firstly, the shot itself. It would be INSANELY difficult to be able to pull off a single shot like that when both ships were moving at flanking speeds in very choppy waters made even more-so by their blended wakes. I can’t think of any one sniper in the world that could make that kind of shot with any kind of certainty. At the very best, it would be a shot of extreme luck. Also, the “bullet” that was pulled from Watson’s vest is much too large to have been fired from a rifle or even a handgun smaller than a .50 cal handgun. Also, from what I was able to tell from Animal Planet’s footage, it did not have the structural shape of any bullet I have ever seen before, both in the military and as a CSI. It looked like it was simply a hollowed out metal dome shape with jagged edges.

    Secondly, it is only after the entire “battle” that Watson notes that he’s been shot. As stated on the show by the Japanese, when you get shot you know it. The impact is strong and it’s like getting slammed by a sledgehammer. No person who has been shot, especially by a round the size they claim they pulled from his vest which impacted against him so hard it dented his badge, would simply not notice it. Additionally, no bullet will maintain its shape after striking not only a bulletproof vest, but the metal badge beneath it with enough force to actually dent the badge as Watson claims. If he had really been shot, that bullet would have mushroomed at the tip and been completely flat not domed and perfectly shaped.

    Thirdly, and most importantly, even if you believe that what Watson pulled from his vest was indeed a bullet, the impact and subsequent damage done to Watson don’t match. If you watch, the “round” was pulled from Watson’s vest with the bullet hole in the upper left pectoral area. When Watson shows off his “injury” as a result of the bullet strike, the bruise/scratch he claims the bullet left on his skin is located in the center of his chest in line with his chin. From all of the conversations on the show, there was some speculation that the pin of his badge caused the bruise/scratch when the bullet impacted it. The problem with this theory is that even if the badge was dented by a bullet strike, the pin of the badge is no where near long enough to cause a scratch in the location Watson indicated as his injury, no matter how much the badge was deformed by the strike. In a nutshell, there is no physical way Watson could have been struck by a bullet and sustain the injury he displayed.

    What all of this means is, quite simply, the shooting was faked by Watson and his mental case cronies in an effort to try and justify his terrorist activities by pretending to be the poor victims. The fact that Animal Planet is documenting these people’s activities is quite disturbing. Despite the claim at the beginning of the show that the views of Sea Shepherd do not reflect the views of Discovery and Animal Planet, the producers have obviously tried to paint the Sea Shepherd terrorist organization in quite a positive light. Why the Sea Shepherd organization has not been shut down and the leaders thrown into prison is beyond comprehension because the only message it is sending is that you can act like pirates, thugs, and terrorists and get away with it no legal consequences and be sensationalized as a “hero”.

    As foolish of a hope as it is, I hope that many members of varied governments have seen this show, take notice of it, and start taking legal action against this organization and have it dismantled and its members thrown in prison.

    I am not an advocate of whaling and I do strongly believe in protecting the ecology and wildlife of our planet, but the line is drawn when you attack people who are operating legally (yes, the Japanese were operating their whaling efforts legally) and then lie about every single thing that is done both on your part and the part of your targets. Watson has said in the past that he has no problem going to prison to protect the whales yet every time he has been arrested and arraigned in the past he has fled before a trial could take place. That’s the act of a coward, not a humanitarian.

  • jim

    if he really got shot, there would be at least a bruise on his chest, but more likely an indentation with possible broken ribs.
    Bullet proof vest only keeps the bullet from penetrating your body,. Your body still takes the damage caused by the force or energy of the bullet.

  • C. S

    Here you are bickering about laws and what is legal and not legal, missing the point that no matter what human convention or law says, the slaughter of whales is a crime against nature, is barbaric, and sadistic. It is always right to save whales, and always wrong to kill them. Right is right and wrong is wrong, regardless of what the law sayes about it. What Hitler did was legal according to German laws that he had a hand in creating, but it was wrong. The right ones were those who broke the law to save jews. The true example of justice is one breaks corrupt laws created by evil people, in order to see justice observed. The world system is evil, and all centers around money. Any righteous people who dissent against the government puppets backed powerfull phsycopaths and terrorists like fur farms, factory farms, HLS, sport hunters, pesticide manufactures, ruthless land developers, chemical corporations, and the Japanese whale murderes are branded terrorists because they pose a threat to the satanic and evil ways of these powers. These whales are actually higher beings than humans, and any human that kills one should receive the death penalty immediatly.

  • Me

    C.S. > I just wanted to bring the fact that you are a complete nut-job to your attention. You may want to see to that.

  • AJ

    The Sea Sheperds are engaging in terrorist activities, they (by their own definition) are attempting to scare the whalers from continuing their practice of killing whales. This article is bizarre in the fact that it unilaterally states that “Captain” (term used loosely) Paul was shot. This is a subject that is widely up for debate and that I doubt very much, based on the fact that the story was so romanticized by this childish imbecile (Uh huh, the bullet went through your bullet proof vest, uh huh, and you were only saved by you “save the whales” button? Hmmm?!)
    These sophomoric and violent idiots are going to get themselves or someone else killed, probably on purpose, in order to bring attention to what they consider is a crime. Let’s remember Japan is voluntarily involved with the IWC, they could drop out at any time and kill as many whales as they feel since the Minke that they are hunting are in international waters, coincidentally, the Minke are one whale species that is not endangered, in fact their population has grown since the moratorium began in the 80′s. Remember also, that whaling represents less than 5% of non-natural whale deaths in the world, accidents in over-crowded shipping lanes represents over 75%
    Take that Paul, and go eat ben and Jerry’s and tell college freshman how cool you once were, and how you almost did something really dumb to not even have a chance at changing the outcome for whales in the world.

  • Althor

    “Whale Wars” is the most disgusting, abhorrent, show on TV.
    In sooth the Sea Shepherd, with its skull and crossbones flag and its aggressive radical tactics, are but eco-terrorists. Can someone please put a couple of torpedoes into its hull and take us all out of our misery?!?!

  • http://www.greenisthenewred.com Will Potter

    I may be missing something, but is torpedoing a ship not an “aggressive radical tactic”?

  • Althor

    In the case of the Japanese whalers being attacked so savegely by the Sea Shepherd, torpedoing them is an act of “self-defense”…not withstanding that it will also obviously take them off the air (or cable rather) which will be a “blessing” to all of us, and open up the “air time” for better programming!

    I hope to God someone sinks them for good!

  • Duncan

    Illegally boarding a vessel that is underway is a serious crime. The Japanese have every right to defend themselves and their restraint when it comes to dealing with the Sea Shepherds has been remarkable. The Japanese would be justified in shooting the Sea Shepherds when they attempt to board their vessel. I am always interested by comments that say the Sea Shepherds were held hostage by the Japanese. The Sea Shepherds were not held hostage; they were under arrest. From the moment they chose to illegally board a Japanese vessel they IMMEDIATELY fell under Japanese law. The Japanese have been far more tolerant of the illegal activities of the Sea Shepherds than they should be.

  • Nippo

    Apparently torpedoing and sinking someone in the open ocean is a perfectly reasonable retaliation act against someone using obstructive practices in order to stop something that’s violating the law….Like are you people serious? “OH they threw a bottle at me! I’ll just sink them with a torpedo” Yea that makes perfect sense….It doesn’t matter anyway, Antarctica is a demilitarized zone, meaning no weapons. Furthermore Japan can’t legally sink the SSCS because contrary to popular belief the SSCS are not pirate ships which can just be sunk. The SSCS are perfectly legal ships that are registered to New Zealand, Australia, and the Netherlands. So you obvious pro-whalers here who are trolling this page need to understand the laws better. There’s a reason why the SSCS have not been charged for obstructing whaling in the SOWS, because their protest is legal. The whalers are basically lying about their true purpose in the SOWS even though the IWC has routinely voted for Japan to omit the lethal aspects of their research. Furthermore they’re violating several laws including the Madrid Protocols which state that “All scientific expeditions in the Antarctic must submit environmental safety assessments” something in which Japan has failed to do, so even if they use the research loophole they’re still violating the law. Also coming up this summer a new law is going to be passed which essentially ban ships like the Nisshin Maru from entering Antarctic Waters.

    Lol “OH they threw a bottle at me! I’ll just sink them with a torpedo” Yea that makes perfect sense….

  • Guest

    Sea Shepherd “savage attacks” on whalers include things like rotten butter filled bottles, tangling up propellers with rope. They are so violent they even banned the presence of Pete Bethune’s bow and arrows on their ship! Yes, whalers are right. Rotten butter is deadly!

  • Jon927

    Sorry whale doting mental patients.  Paul Watson is the criminal!!!

  • Jon927

    I love how these whale doting retards always ignore the facts.  It’s laughable always.  And why do you morons only bring up Japan?  Huh?  You are only capable of regurgitating what Paul Watson feeds you right?  That’s clearly the case here.  Paul Watson himself is violating a ton of laws.  Why do you think that moron did not register any of his ships in USA and went with his equally money grubbing eco-terror loving retard friendly nation to register his boats?  Paul Watson is a criminal and a terrorist.  It’s that simple.

  • Jon927

    But slaughtering cows, pigs, chickens, ducks, alligators, rattlesnakes aren’t crime against nature?  Why?  Because you adore the taste of those meats?  I laugh heartily at mental patients like you.  I really do.  ha ha. Pathetic.  Only your precious whales matter? I suppose our treatment of calves to put veal on your plate is wonderfully civilized right?  All you pretend animal lovers make me gut bust out laughing.

  • Whale-eater

    Paul Watson and his gang are criminals and terrorists.  They should be shot on sight and sunk to the bottom of the ocean like bin Laden.

  • Watson is a Criminal Thug

    You need to “understand the laws better”: Watson and his gang of thugs have no standing to enforce any laws, if any laws were even being broken by the Japanese.

    You’d be the first to whine about “vigilantes” if some average Joe shot a burglar in his living room, but here you are making excuses for a gang of thugs who have committed violent crimes all around the globe.

Previous post:

Next post: