Comments on: FBI Agent: Video Surveillance Used to Track Activist Leafleting

By: Will Potter

Will Potter — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:30:26 +0000

Made up of FBI agents? Huh?

By: Greenconsciousness

Greenconsciousness — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:01:03 +0000

The ALF never lit any fires — that was ELF – a totally different organization with different ethics — mostly made up of FBI agents.

By: Greenconsciousness

Greenconsciousness — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:58:31 +0000

Are face coverings illegal? Good because I object to Muslim women covering their faces with slave garments in public. It demeans all women. Give me the cite to the law baning face covering and let’s see how the government defends that law when it interferes with treating women as slaves.

By: Will Potter

Will Potter — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:31:36 +0000

@Not Mr. GreenJeans:

That’s incorrect. You’re quoting the criminal complaint. The actual indictment does NOT list that incident, and the defendants are not accused of anything related to that incident. Read it here:
http://www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/animal-rights-activists-indicted-as-terrorists-for-home-protests/1657/

By: Not Mr. GreenJeans

Not Mr. GreenJeans — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:05:07 +0000

This is not a case of peaceful protest. It’s menacing and threatening. The charges include the following:

“On February 24, 2008, five to six individuals including Mr. Pope, Ms. Stumpo, and Ms. Khajavi, attempted to forcibly enter the private home of a University of California researcher in Santa Cruz. When her husband opened the door, a struggle ensued and he was hit by an object. As the individuals fled, one yelled, “We’re gonna get you.” The professor and her husband both told the FBI they were terrified by the incident”.

If a jury finds them guilty there will not be any public sympathy for their permanent felony records and jail time, except of course among the “animal rights” groupies.

By: Roger Zynth

Roger Zynth — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:26:23 +0000

This was not a case of “peaceful demonstrations”. These were criminals using harassment to interfere with normal business operations, they knew exactly what they were doing. It doesn’t matter if the defendants personally caused any of the attacks, if they were conspirators in the conspiracy to attack then they are also liable under the act. Anti-abortion “activists” tried the same type of defenses under when charged with FACE act violations, it didn’t work. I think that when you extend a so-called “demonstration” against a company or organization into personal attacks and harassment of individuals, it transgresses the line of peaceful protest into that of criminality. It also says a lot about the cowardice and lack of rational behavior exhibited by the so-called “animal rights” activist movement.

By: R. Mueller

R. Mueller — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:44:50 +0000

Jerk
Off
Extraordinaire

By: Joe

Joe — Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:09:00 +0000

A assholes
L lighting
F fires

By: Wolfie

Wolfie — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 02:14:31 +0000

Fucking
Brainless
Idiots.

By: s

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:29:39 +0000

thanks for posting. I think this will backfire on the government, they are forgetting that activists have families and friends, who while might not be into animal rights, sure as hell care about their family or friends being thrown in jail for no reason.