Comments on: Church Sues After Being “Terrorized” by Gay Activists Kissing

By: Bettifree

Bettifree — Sat, 16 Apr 2011 20:39:00 +0000

The majority of people posting here think that “tolerance” means “shut up and go away if you don’t totally support gay activism and gay culture.” “Don’t judge” means “don’t dare to disagree with us”. The more in-your-face obnoxious you get, the more gays will find yourselves shunned.
I notice that gays never storm the mosques and don’t even protest outside them. Hmmm…I wonder why? LOL. : )
No, seriously, you should all organize a nice, peaceful kissing protest inside the nearest Islamic place of worship. Demand that the Muslims forget about Allah and the Quran and listen to the all-important homosexual POV. I can’t see any way you could possibly go wrong. C’mon! Why aren’t you standing at the front door knocking RIGHT NOW…and yelling…and waving signs? Islam is clear about the sinful nature of homosexuality and is not shy about the death penalty. It’s time to set them straight. Or gay, as it were. I imagine it would be a very famous protest: famous and SHORT.

By: Will Potter

Will Potter — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:40:13 +0000

“Approve”

By: Jthompson31

Jthompson31 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:38:38 +0000

hell naw !

By: johnnygp

johnnygp — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:12:04 +0000

So what Paul108H is saying is that during pre-life my soul chose to be afflicted with faggotry? Well, hooray for my soul!

By: Julian Vigo

Julian Vigo — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:36:19 +0000

I would hope the defense would countersue the Christian for:

1. Violently brash dress code;
2. Dangerously ignorant statements that incite censoreship directly and violence indirectly;
3. Disseminating hate speech;
4. The brash display of religious iconography and language which is itself violent, a form of psychological violence (ie. crucifictions, baptism by fire, burning in hell, etc).
5. Hypocritical speech as psychological terrorism–the Bible is replete with homophilic and homosexual stories that are the basis up which stories of equality and love for others are based.

By: Joe

Joe — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:01:15 +0000

Hi everyone, I have been in the field the last couple of weeks working on a radio telemetry project and was not able to look at or respond to post.

This sentence from ARPhilo caught my eye “The stupidity of people and their ability to retranslate and reword things to fit a hate agenda amazes me.”

I couldn’t agree more, it has always amazed me how animal rights terrorist will reword the definition of terrorism to meet their agenda.

By: ARPhilo

ARPhilo — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:56:49 +0000

Uhhhh Paul108H? The “translation” is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than the “purport” on that page you posted. It’s like Christians talking about homosexuality as sin when really the book states that hedonism, rape, and promiscuity for the sake of it were sin, which happened to include homosexuality at times- so rather than addressing all promiscuity and rape as a whole- they pin it on homosexuals only and homosexuality as a whole despite the fact that many are not promiscuous. So many religions are guilty of this… The stupidity of people and their ability to retranslate and reword things to fit a hate agenda amazes me.

Even your religious text does not share your hate.

By: Mike

Mike — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 07:26:06 +0000

They sure don’t make terrorists like they used to.

Next, we’ll hear that the Boston mayor’s panicking over some lite-brites scattered around the city. Oh, wait, that already happened.

01-31-2007: Boston will never forget

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:53:28 +0000

mr. paul 108h(ate) (any relation to kate 08)

aren’t you supposed to give up material possessions? I hope you’re typing these notes at the public library, coz I’m not sure that ray cappo will be happy that you own a computer.

you mention science, though i’m not sure exactly why or that you really believe in science — please use science to prove that “homosexuality is sinful”

By: Lin

Lin — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:00:55 +0000

WOW….It’s obvious that you and I are going to have to play on different sides of the playground, because we are definitely not going to get along. I suggested that it might be a good idea to justify your beliefs with something other than quotes from religious writings because it’s easier for everyone to just blow off what your saying since they don’t subscribe to the same philosophical ideas….and your response is that what you’re saying is cold hard fact driven scientific data because it comes from the mouth of god.
I’ll give credit where credit is due though….You’re very well trained in the “fire burns both the christian AND the athiest….so therefore, God exists” rhetoric.